Writing Difficulty

 

I’m working on a piece about something I didn’t want to write about. I didn’t want to write about it because I didn’t want to go back to that place. “But it’s such a good story,” I thought. And it is. There are coincidences and synchronicities that I couldn’t have planned any better if I was writing fiction. It’s a good story, and it’s going to be a good essay, because I tend to write best when I’m writing from a place of emotion.

I’m convincing myself to go back and work on it some more.

It’s odd, because writing has always been catharsis. Once I spew everything out onto the page, it’s out, and I feel better. Writing this feels like scratching a partially-healed wound. Maybe it was too early. Maybe I should have waited longer.

Natalia Ginzburg, in her essay, “My Craft” says, “I learned it was exhausting to write seriously. It’s a bad sign if you’re not exhausted . . . When you write something serious, you sink into it and drown right up to your eyes . . . to the extent that the writing is valid, and worthy of life, every other feeling will become dormant” (46, trans. Lynne Sharon Schwartz).

My friend Gary says, “Writing has been like unspooling a tightly wrapped ball of yarn into an itchy sweater. I’m always uncomfortable with what I’ve done but it feels like an accomplishment.”

Sometimes, we forget that writing is hard for everyone. I guess I did. I’m exhausted, I’m itching, but, thanks to Gary and Ginzburg, I’ll keep going.

And you, you out there, if you’re having a hard time writing, you keep going too.

Vanishing History

From User Ghyomm on Gnome Art

From User Ghyomm on Gnome Art

I heard, on the train from Chicago, that another piece of history had vanished. We were passing greenery, neat houses flashing by as we entered more and more suburban territory. Only two more stops.

And then the phone rang.

“Where are you?”

“I’m near the racetrack, Mum. I’ll be there soon.”

“So how was group?”

“Oh, it was okay.”

“Just okay? What happened?” My mother’s discussion group at a local senior living community is one of the highlights of her week. She leads her seniors in a discussion of various aspects of their lives, always grateful that she helps, in some small way, preserve history.

“Yeah. I got the news that Chakkarai Paati passed away.”

“What? I–I’ll be there soon.”

“Yeah, I know. I’m fine.”

As the greenery and neat houses continued to flick by, changing occasionally into storefronts and cars, I thought. I was more shocked than anything. Not upset, because I hadn’t exactly been close to Chakkarai Paati. She was one of those relatives who seem impossibly ancient to a young child. A great-grandmother. My great-grandmother.

All I really remember of Chakkarai Paati in health is her upright posture, her tight bun of coconut-oiled hair, her silk sari gleaming as she sat in state and imperiously directed her son, daughter-in-law and maids whenever we went to visit. The TV would usually be on, tuned either to cricket or her favorite Tamil serials. My last memory of her is of her daughter-in-law yelling that I was going to do a namaskaaram before leaving. I knelt in front of her and pressed my forehead to the ground, remembering the feel of her soft, fine skin, stretched almost too tightly over the bones of the hand she’d offered me when I arrived. She muttered a blessing over me, though I could barely hear what she said. And then I stood up and left, saddened by the rubber sheet on the bed and the discussion about adult diapers.

The train arrived and I rushed to the car to give my mother a hug. It was only when we got home and she began to reminisce that I realized just how much history had just left the earth.

Chakkarai Paati was married at age 9. As happened in those days, she stayed with her family until she hit puberty, then was sent off to live with her husband. There followed a 74-year relationship, broken only when my great-grandfather died.

In a patriarchal society, Chakkarai Paati was undisputedly the matriarch of her family. My great-grandfather might have been the one who brought the money and the status as an accountant at Fraser & Ross. He might have been the reason for the numerous trips to England, the strawberries and cream at Wimbledon, the invitations to balls (yes, balls) in British-ruled Madras in the first half of the twentieth century. He might have been one of the cream of the Indian crop who got to associate with the British on at least nominally equal footing. But she was the one who ran the household, far into her seventies and eighties. She negotiated with the gardener. She disciplined her rambunctious grandchildren. She made such wonderful food that my mother always took care to visit just in time for lunch. Her husband was a mild-mannered man who delighted his grandchildren by taking them to the Woodlands Drive-In once in a while. She fed them every day during the summer vacations they spent at the house. She disciplined them when they broke something or made too much noise.

Everyone was a little afraid of her.

But she lived through Independence. She traveled abroad at a time when many women never traveled out of their hometowns. She lived through Partition and Gandhi’s assassination and some of the most fractious times in India’s history. She lived through plenty of suffering in her own family’s history.

And now, she is no more.

As always, I now think of a hundred questions I should have asked about her life. But my parents and I console ourselves. She’d have been delighted that, decades later, we followed in her footsteps to Wimbledon.

Why Ferguson Matters

black lives matter

I don’t know whether Darren Wilson was justified in shooting 18-year-old Michael Brown. I believe that a trial would have given us more information. Sadly, a trial didn’t occur. I’d urge you to read the Grand Jury testimony here and form your own opinions. These are mine.

Michael Brown’s death is tragic in the way that the death of any young person is tragic, in the way that any life ended too soon is tragic, in the way that a life taken by another human being is tragic. But what makes Michael Brown’s death especially tragic is that it is an example and a symbol of institutionalized racism. Whether Darren Wilson was justified in using deadly force is a question for lawyers to answer.

If Brown did in fact charge an officer, who was “afraid he would kill me,” Wilson may have been justified. But consider this. This summer in Nevada, a cattle rancher aided by armed militia got into an armed standoff with federal officials over the fact that his cattle were grazing on federal land. The worst that happened to the rancher and the militia–arrests and tasing. No one was shot. No one got seriously injured, in spite of the fact that a police dog was kicked and officers were assaulted. Obviously, these are slightly different cases, but they can still be compared. Federal officials knew that the rancher’s militia allies were armed. Wilson suspected that Brown was armed. Officers were assaulted in both cases. Look at the difference in the force used.

But this is still arguable. Maybe Wilson reacted instinctively because he felt he was in more immediate danger of his life. Maybe. Would a trial have cleared all of this up? No. Would it have given us more evidence. Most definitely. In the absence of a trial, the symbolic value of Michael Brown’s death has exploded. A very intelligent black woman told me that what’s saddest about Ferguson is that it makes her feel like her life doesn’t matter anymore. If a Grand Jury is not even willing to go to trial on this issue to investigate further, are they likely to investigate the killings of other black people? More broadly, if we are not willing to take the killing of a black teenager to trial, how can we be ready to combat the more subtle forms of racism entrenched in society today?

Being black in America is still profoundly different from being of any other race. I’m a racial minority, but I am part of a model minority. People expect good behavior out of me. People seem to expect the opposite out of people who are black. A white neighbor called the police when she saw a Harvard professor trying to force his way into his own home when he returned from a trip to China. The door was jammed. He is black. An eighteen-year-old boy was pepper-sprayed when police entered his home after a neighbor mistook him for a burglar. He is the foster son of a white family who had just moved to a new neighborhood. He is also black.

People don’t call the police when they see white people trying to force a jammed door. They don’t call the police when they see an unfamiliar white person entering the house belonging to those new neighbors they haven’t met yet. Police officers don’t seem so quick to pull triggers when white people are involved.

This is why Ferguson matters. This is why Trayvon Martin’s death matters. This is why Tamir Rice‘s death matters. This is why Ferguson is a race issue, though black people kill other black people, white people kill other white people and black people kill white people everyday. Because when prejudice becomes a part of society, when it seeps into the institutions that are supposed to keep us safe, it corrupts the very foundations of those institutions.  Because when part of a population who are citizens of this country can feel like they don’t matter, like they are unjustly labeled when they are doing something entirely innocent, that is a significant problem.

Sans Teeth, Sans Eyes, Sans Computer

Is this not all of our lives? Comic by xkcd.com.

Is this not all of our lives? Comic by xkcd.com.

The reason I’ve been away from this blog for two months now (aside from the seductive tones of 25-page papers) is because I haven’t had a computer. I should have known better than to make promises of “next week”, but I couldn’t have predicted this length of time because of a bum hard drive and miscommunication in the IT department.

Living without a computer to call my own has been… instructive. Oh, I haven’t been living like a Luddite. Phones nowadays don’t permit that. But my computer time was restricted to the library and, having written over a hundred pages last term, there was a lot of it. But, aside from a few brief glances at NBA news when I simply couldn’t stand the thought of French theater for one second longer, my computer time was strictly business.

I didn’t think I was that dependent on my computer. I’m not permanently attached to it. My computer time leaps when I have homework to do–evidence that I don’t spend that much time on it for pleasure. But maybe I was a little bit attached to my computer. Because it was strangely refreshing not to have one of my own.

I read more. I actually managed to read half a book (Snakes and Ladders by Gita Mehta) in the three weeks before finals, right in the thick of my paper writing.

I talked to my roommates. Instead of curling up in my room with FoodNetwork.com’s excellent selection of videos after a hard day of work and homework, I read in the living room or the kitchen. So, when my roommates came by, we chatted for a little bit before returning to our homework or distractions.

Most importantly, I was much more motivated just to get things done. I learned that there’s a significant difference between setting out to write five pages on my couch at home, and setting out to write five pages in the library’s computer lab. There was much more noise in the lab (especially when Investing Club decides to rehearse a presentation about buying stock in CVS). There were more people around. But I got so much done in so little time. I was motivated to get back home to my couch. I didn’t want to stay in the library until midnight and later. So I worked harder, I focused more and I routinely found myself writing seven pages in three hours instead of the five I’d set as my goal.

Sometimes, I walked into the house, exhausted and bad-tempered, unzipped my sweatshirt in my room, threw my backpack down in a corner and slumped down on my bed, aching for a few minutes’ rest before I moved on to my next task. My spirits never failed to rise when I realized that I had no next task. I could read. I could bake. I could–frabjous day–sleep! So I also got much more sleep than I ever have in the week leading up to finals. When I’m tired of thinking, it’s so tempting to fool around on the internet a little–read a few Buzzed lists, catch up on some NBA news, go on Facebook–before I go to bed. “A little” turns into “for two hours” and then I’m relaxed, but it’s also 1 am and I have to wake up in six hours.

My computer’s been fixed. I’m delighted. Especially as it’s started to snow, it’s nice to think I won’t have to walk back from the library in twenty-degree weather. But I wonder what life (and my productivity) will be like now…

Calling Long-Distance…

Well, maybe… But sometimes it's nice to actually be there.

Well, maybe… But sometimes it’s nice to actually be there.

We all try long-distance at some point. Whether the family moves, the friend group splinters when you all go off to different colleges or the best friend goes off to summer camp for a month while you’re stuck at home, we’ve all done it. For me, it first happened when I moved continents at age fourteen. It happened when I went off to college. It happened during my study abroad program to Amsterdam. It’s happening as friends graduate, go to grad school, find jobs, live lives. If there are three things I’ve learned from the relationships I’ve tried (and sometimes failed) to maintain long-distance, it’s these:

1) It doesn’t always work out

Sometimes, no matter how many promises you make to write faithfully, call, text, Skype, stay in touch, it just doesn’t work out. Somebody gets too busy, somebody else feels hurt, and before you know it, it’s been a few months since you contacted each other and you know what, one of you is completely okay with that. Being the other one is awful, but at some point, you have to move on. It’s painful and you can’t help wondering what you did wrong. I sometimes think that, although communications technology is wonderful, it puts you under more pressure to stay in touch. After all, something must have gone wrong if you couldn’t stay in touch with all these ways and means at your fingertips, right? Not really. People change and sometimes, a relationship just ends with not much reason and no rhyme at all.

2) Don’t cling

Because it’s so easy to see on social media where someone last breathed, it’s tempting to want to know exactly what your best friend has been up to in the last thirty seconds. You spent every minute of your time together before you were separated, didn’t you? So how can you live without knowing what outfit your best friend picked for today? Exaggerated, yes, but I’ve noticed that it’s tempting, if you’re the more communicative one in the relationship, to over-communicate. Friend hasn’t replied to your Facebook message of yesterday? Send another one about what you did today. No judgment, no why-aren’t-you-talking-to-me, just a friendly little reminder that you’re still here. But those reminders add up, and if you pile them up high enough, you could suffocate the life out of your friendship. Let the communication proceed at its own pace; don’t communicate just for the sake of communicating.

3) But still, don’t give up too soon

Don’t give up on a relationship just because you haven’t heard back in a while. People get busy, people get lazy, all sorts of things can come in the way of communication. Your relationship isn’t a failure because you said you’d email once a month and you haven’t emailed in six weeks. Let things develop and see what happens. Maybe the reason a friend hasn’t responded to the last three emails you’ve sent is because that friend has moved on. But maybe that friend just gets kind of lazy, but still really appreciates that you make the effort to keep writing. Whether things work out or not, as long as you feel you’ve done all you could to make a relationship work, you shouldn’t have regrets.